Flag_of_Alabama.svg
An official website of the Alabama State government.

The .gov means it's official

Government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on an official government site.

The site is secure

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Services

Services

Business and License

Business and License

Collections

Collections

Entity Registration

Entity Registration

Human Resources

Human Resources

Income Tax

Income Tax

Legal

Legal

Motor Vehicle

Motor Vehicle

Property Tax

Property Tax

Sales and Use

Sales and Use

Tax Incentives

Tax Incentives

Tax Policy

Tax Policy

ADOR Issues Guidance on Taxability of Computer Software

  • Press Release
  • >
  • ADOR Issues Guidance on Taxability of Computer Software

MONTGOMERY, June 19, 2019– The Alabama Supreme Court recently upheld a lower court decision finding that a series of transactions involving the sale of computer software and related equipment was subject to sales tax. The case, Ex parte Russell County Community Hospital, LLC, Case No. 1180204, was decided on May 17, 2019.  In reaching its decision, the Court examined the taxability of the conveyance of computer software versus the taxability of programming and other services that may accompany the conveyance.

After reviewing the existing law addressing the taxability of computer software, the Court concluded that the software transactions at issue in the case were taxable. The Court’s decision is consistent with the department’s long-stated administrative stance that software transactions are taxable, but separately stated or invoiced services that may attend the conveyance of software are not subject to the state’s sales or use tax levies.

The department is undertaking a review of its related administrative rules, which will be updated to ensure that the terminology used to demonstrate this distinction is consistent with that used by the Court in the Ex parte Russell County decision.

Website feedback